Use of nootropics for cognitive enhancement is now the contemporary world’s most trusted biohacking method. And although we have tens of extensively proven brain-boosting pills today, Modafinil is definitely one the very best…if not simply the most effective mind booster in the modern world.
While the top-ranked cognition strengthener makes for a truly peerless biohacking therapy, comparisons between its different chemical and generic varieties continue to elicit interesting arguments, concepts and unverified hypotheses. One of such intriguing discourses compare and contrast with Armodafinil.
Well, Armodafinil – mostly marketed as Nuvigil in the United States – is the eugeroic’s enantiopure compound. Just like the other more popularly known nootropical formula, it is produced and marketed by Cephalon Inc. and met FDA’s approval in 2007.
Most of the comparing mentioned above ordinarily revolves around the two brain-improving variations’ actual efficacy and safety. And to ease any potentially misleading controversies and groundless misinformations, provided hereunder is a fact-backed analyses between the two closely intellect-sharpening formulations…with a couple of facts and figures that sufficiently answer the commonly posed question whether Armodafinil is more dangerous than Modafinil.
Armodafinil Is Evidently Stronger Than Modafinil – And Brings Greater Cognitive Boosts
Clinical surveys and exhaustive medical surveys established the fact that 150mg of Armodafinil is as strong as 20 of Modafinil. Thus, those seeking profounder cognitive improvements within a comparatively short of time may find the former a far better way to achieve their goal than the latter.
Going by these statements, one may comfortably conclude that the characteristically strong strengtheners vary in terms of chemical potency…that is, if the same quantities of each of the two are ingested by the same person on distinct occasions (strictly for comparative reasons, say), and with all chief pharmacological and physiological factors held constant.
With Similar Quantities, Armodafinil Can Trigger Potentiallly Worse Contraindicative Signs
Although Modafinil hardly causes any notable side effects, some consumers have reported a few not-so-serious contraindications. Some of these rarely-cited side effects include mild headaches or migraines and an uncharacteristically dry mouth. Others are skin itchiness and a palpably accelerated pulse rate.
Thus, the biohacking formula’s fans who take the indisputably stronger variety are likely to experience correspondingly worsened contraindicative signs.
This means that you should be somehow prepares to make do with probably more persistent head-throbs, in case you opt to sample the more potent pharmaceutical version…and the same is quite true of the rest of the potential contraindications commonly associated with the more powerful form of this very brain-improving substance – the ones highlighted hereinabove.
Armodafinil Is as Effective As 200 mg of Modafinil – and Poses Equal Contraindicative Risks
Lastly, conclusive medical research findings show that 150 mg of Armodafinil is as strong as 200 mg of Modafinil. The same survey conclusions portray that the equally potent intake measurements pose unvaried contraindicative possibilities…despite the former being substantially stronger than the latter.
This is the very reason why most websites and health experts say that the cognitive booster and its more chemically stronger enantiomer do not present any variance with specific regard to severity of side effects.
Regardless of the verified points detailed above, a rather small percentage of the nootropic’s adherents tend to think that Armodafinil does trigger greater contraindicative downsides.
All these informal allegations however remain principally unconfirmed reports that need further science-backed corroboration before possible admission as empirical truths.
Wrapping it all up, Modafinil and Armodafinil are very similar pharmaceutical substances with very few dissimilarities. Their slight chemical variations however occasion some small but quite distinct variances that are easily discernible from their cognition-improving outcomes.
All the same, the points discussed herein almost exhaustively detail their key distinctions, as evidenced in the larger percentage of the famous drug’s regular users.
Besides, the principal ideas cited in the preceding paragraphs, it’s vital to note that there could be many extra risk-related differences between the two closely linked chemical products.
For instance, people who have used each of the pharmaceutical formulations on distinct occasions confess to have found the stronger one to cause greater and more persistent thirsts. This, they say, was evidenced by their need to take clearly many more glasses of water after taking the more potent variety.
And, although still very far from being formally confirmed, such a factually telling revelation would imply that the more powerful dosage might often trigger more severe contraindicative headaches, set against the weaker variety.